Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047
Original file (2014 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-047

 

CURRENT DD-214 General, COMDTINST M1000.6 12-B-18, JKK, Misconduct, RE4
RELIEF REQUESTED _| Change to Honorable

BY DRB
CORRECTIONS

TIS 1 yrs, 10 months, 4 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs in 2006.

During a unit investigation, the applicant admitted to Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) agents of
repeated drug use during the current term in service. In addition to the statement made, there was drug
paraphernalia found in the applicant’s barracks room.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was notified of the intent to
discharge and did chose to make a statement. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the
Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. The
Character of Service may not be listed as ‘General’ on the DD-214 issued (Block 24 of the form).

Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions
character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The Coast
Guard has zero tolerance for drug abuse. The General, Under Honorable Conditions separation is equitable.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief other than the

administrative change to Under Honorable Conditions for the Character of Service based on ALCOAST
562/08.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 059

    Original file (2013 059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. In accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post- separation policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 075

    Original file (2013 075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-075 General, COMDTINST 1000.6A 12-B-18, JKK, Misconduct, RE4 Honorable Admin correction based on post-policy from ALCOAST 562/08 Under Honorable Conditions TIS 2 yrs, 8 months, 25 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 031

    Original file (2014 031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 038

    Original file (2013 038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. Yet, in accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the Board does recommend that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post-separation policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 002

    Original file (2014 002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Per post policy noted in ALCOAST 562/08, a General discharge is no longer considered an official character of service.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 001

    Original file (2014 001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. Therefore, the Board recommends the use of SPD code JKM to accurately categorize this as an act of misconduct not otherwise listed by the JKK SPD code. Additionally, the Board notes that the DD-214 issued ‘General’ for the Character of Service.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 041

    Original file (2013 041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had a positive urinalysis result for methamphetamines in the late summer of 2005. The Board notes a General Discharge was issued. Therefore, the board recommends a partial upgrade to an Under Honorable Conditions character of service.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 076

    Original file (2012 076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety in this case. The Board finds no issues of equity in this case. Therefore, the applicant should be issued a DD-215 reflecting this administrative change.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 073

    Original file (2012 073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EQUITY: The Board finds no issues with equity in this case. The applicant’s character of service is consistent with policy and appropriate for personnel processed for use of illegal drugs. The appropriate character of service is “Under Honorable Conditions,” therefore the Board recommends an administrative change to the applicant’s record to reflect “Under Honorable Conditions” per ALCOAST 562/08.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 027

    Original file (2013 027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Majority board recommends partial relief on the applicant’s Character of Service, based on the post-policy issued in ALCOAST 562/08. And, ALCOAST 254/05 on May 12, 2005 stated the following: “The Coast Guard may resume Anthrax vaccinations for personnel assigned to designated commands but only under the condition that personnel scheduled to receive the Anthrax vaccination may ACCEPT or REFUSE the vaccination. Board Conclusion: The Majority Board (3-2) recommends no relief to the...